Abdominal Radiography
Basics
Type of Procedure
Radiographic
Procedure Explanation and Related Physiology
Two orthogonal projections of the abdomen are taken — a right or left lateral and a ventrodorsal (VD) view — covering everything from the cranial-most part of the diaphragm to the pelvic inlet. Exposure settings are chosen from the patient’s thickness. The hind legs are drawn gently caudally so they do not overlap the caudal abdomen and so the abdominal contents spread out, and the radiographs are made at full expiration.
Indications
- To confirm or narrow down the cause of clinical signs referable to the abdominal organs — most often vomiting and diarrhea.
- To determine origin of palpable abdominal mass.
- To determine the extent of abdominal disease, including metastasis evaluation.
Contraindications
None
Potential Complications
None
Client Education
- Ideally the patient is fasted for 12–24 h and given an enema before the radiographs are made.
- Sedation may be required.
Body Systems Assessed
- Cardiovascular
- Endocrine and metabolic
- Gastrointestinal
- Hemic, lymphatic, and immune
- Hepatobiliary
- Renal and urologic
- Reproductive
Procedure
Patient Preparation
Preprocedure Medication or Preparation
- Food is withheld from the patient for 12–24 h before imaging.
- An enema is ideally given 1–2 h before the radiographs are made.
- Note: withholding food and giving enemas are not always practical.
Anesthesia or Sedation
As needed. Some sedatives affect GI motility (see Hall & Watrous 2000).
Patient Positioning
- Lateral projections: left or right lateral recumbency, with the hind legs gently extended caudally to limit superimposition on the caudal abdomen.
- VD projection: dorsal recumbency, with the hind legs gently extended caudally to limit superimposition on the caudal abdomen.
Patient Monitoring
N/A
Equipment or Supplies
- X-ray machine
- X-ray cassette loaded with film or digital x-ray detector
- Grid—for animals that are >10 cm thick
- Patient restraint devices—tape and sand bags—help minimize radiation exposure to personnel.
Technique
- Two orthogonal projections of the abdomen are made — a right or left lateral and a VD view — spanning the cranial-most part of the diaphragm to the pelvic inlet. Exposure settings follow the patient’s thickness. The hind legs are drawn gently caudally so they do not overlap the caudal abdomen and so the abdominal contents spread out, and the radiographs are produced at full expiration.
Sample Handling
N/A
Appropriate Aftercare
Postprocedure Patient Monitoring
none
Nursing Care
none
Dietary Modification
none
Medication Requirements
none
Restrictions on Activity
none
Anticipated Recovery Time
Recovery is immediate or determined by the sedative used.
Interpretation
Normal Findings or Range
- Read abdominal radiographs with a systematic technique. Some organs are seen routinely; others are not, and should still be considered every time a study is interpreted.
- Abdominal organs normally seen: liver, stomach, spleen, kidneys, urinary bladder, prostate, and intestines.
- Abdominal organs not normally seen: ureters, urethra, ovaries, pancreas, and lymph nodes.
Abnormal Values
Peritoneal Cavity
- Normal appearance: the margins of the abdominal organs are discernible, although many structures overlap and partly hide each other’s margins.
- Radiographic abnormality: decreased serosal margin detail — a homogeneous soft-tissue opacity in which the organs cannot be told apart; it may be diffuse or focal.
Causes:
Normal condition: young animal
Abnormal conditions: peritoneal effusion, lack of intraabdominal fat, emaciation
Plan:
Abdominal ultrasound, abdominocentesis (if peritoneal effusion present)
- Radiographic abnormality: increased serosal margin detail (pneumoperitoneum) — free gas in the peritoneal cavity outlines the abdominal organs more clearly.
Causes:
After surgery, gas remains in the peritoneal cavity for 3–5 days and may persist for 2 weeks.
Ruptured GI tract: usually a surgical emergency
Penetrating abdominal wall wound
Plan:
Horizontal beam radiography to confirm pneumoperitoneum
Abdominal Masses
- Normal appearance: no abdominal masses
- Radiographic abnormality: masses are usually soft-tissue opaque and displace neighbouring organs, especially the intestines. Dividing the abdomen into regions — cranial, middle, caudal, dorsal, ventral, left and right — and asking what normally lies in each helps localise the likely origin of a mass.
Causes:
Neoplasia, hyperplasia, abscess, hematoma
Plan:
Abdominal ultrasound, contrast procedures (upper GI, excretory urogram, cystogram, etc.), FNA, or biopsy
Organs Normally Seen on Abdominal Radiographs
Liver
- Normal appearance: a homogeneous soft-tissue opacity caudal to the diaphragm and cranial to the stomach. Liver size is usually judged from the position of the stomach, which on the lateral view should lie parallel to the intercostal spaces.
- Radiographic abnormality: hepatomegaly shifts the gastric axis caudally — the pylorus moves caudodorsally on the lateral view and the stomach caudally on the VD view. Involvement may be diffuse or focal.
Causes:
Diffuse: fat or glycogen infiltration, neoplasia (primary or metastatic), hepatic congestion (right heart failure), hepatitis
Focal: neoplasia (primary or metastatic), cysts, abscess, nodular hyperplasia
Plan:
Abdominal ultrasound, FNA, or biopsy
- Radiographic abnormality: microhepatica shifts the gastric axis cranially and lets the stomach move cranially on the VD view; the liver is typically only 1 intercostal space wide.
Causes:
Portosystemic shunt
Cirrhosis
Plan:
Transsplenic nuclear portography, positive-contrast portography
Stomach
- Normal appearance: varies with its contents — usually gas and fluid (soft tissue), sometimes mineral — and its size depends on how much is in the lumen. Because the stomach can distend remarkably, repeating the radiographs several hours later helps show whether an enlarged stomach is emptying (physiologic) or not (pathologic).
- Radiographic abnormality: gastric dilation with gas, fluid, ingesta, or a combination; the pylorus stays in the right cranioventral abdomen, and the enlarged stomach pushes the abdominal organs — except the liver — caudally.
Causes:
A recent meal causes gastric distention that resolves with time.
Aerophagia
- Radiographic abnormality: GDV — the pylorus is rotated into the left craniodorsal abdomen, the stomach is usually compartmentalized and the spleen often malpositioned; the enlarged stomach pushes the abdominal organs, except the liver, caudally.
- Radiographic abnormality: gastric outflow obstruction with fluid and/or ingesta; stomach size depends on the degree of obstruction. The diagnosis is made from serial radiographs while food is withheld, or with an upper GI study.
Causes:
Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, pylorospasm, pyloric inflammation or fibrosis, neoplasia
Plan:
Positive-contrast gastrogram, gastric ultrasound, endoscopy
- Radiographic abnormality: gastric foreign body of varying opacity. Metallic and mineral objects are the easiest to detect; soft-tissue foreign bodies blend in with gastric fluid.
Critical Values
- Pneumoperitoneum in an animal that has not had recent surgery
- GDV
- GI obstruction
Interfering Factors
Drugs That May Alter Results of the Procedure
GI modulating drugs (Hall & Watrous 2000)
Conditions That May Interfere with Performing the Procedure
None
Procedure Techniques or Handling That May Alter Results
None
Influence of Signalment on Performing and Interpreting the Procedure
Species:
None
Breed:
None
Age:
None
Gender:
None
Pregnancy:
None
Clinical Perspective
Abdominal ultrasound and abdominal radiography do not replace each other. Radiographs keep the spatial relationships between the abdominal organs, and they are better for sizing the intestines when obstruction is suspected because different bowel segments can be compared with one another; ultrasound cannot show the whole abdomen in one image. The strengths of ultrasound are describing the internal architecture of organs and showing structures that radiographs normally miss (e.g., the adrenal glands). Abdominal CT is an emerging modality in veterinary medicine that shows the spatial relationships of the abdominal organs and gives information on their internal architecture.
Miscellaneous
Ancillary Tests
The tests used depend on the abnormality; plans are given in the text above.
Synonyms
None
See Also
Blackwell’s Five-Minute Veterinary Consult: Canine and Feline Topics
Many
Related Topics
- General Principles of Radiography
- Abdominal Ultrasonography
- Abdominocentesis and Fluid Analysis
- Adrenal Ultrasonography
- Barium-Impregnated Polyethylene Spheres (BIPS)
- Computed Tomography
- Cystourethrography (male, female, canine, feline)
- Excretory Urography
- Gastrointestinal Ultrasonography
- Horizontal Beam Radiography
- Liver and Gallbladder Ultrasonography (including portohepatic shunts)
- Lower Gastrointestinal Radiographic Contrast Studies (includes air and barium)
- Lower Urinary Tract Ultrasonography (bladder, prostate, urethra)
- Pancreatic Ultrasonography
- Renal Ultrasonography (including comments on ureters)
- Splenic Ultrasonography
- Ultrasound-Guided Mass or Organ Aspiration
- Upper Gastrointestinal Radiographic Contrast Studies (including pneumogastrogram)
- Uterine Ultrasonography
- Vaginography
Abbreviations
- CT = computed tomography
- FNA = fine-needle aspiration
- GDV = gastric dilatation and volvulus syndrome
- VD = ventrodorsal
References
- Decaro, N., Buonavoglia, C. (2012). Canine parvovirus- a review of epidemiological and diagnostic aspects, with emphasis on type 2c. Veterinary Microbiology, 155(1), 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.09.007
- Appel, M.J.G., Scott, F.W. (2007). Canine parvovirus. In Greene, C.E. (Ed.), Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat (4th ed., pp. 67-78). Saunders Elsevier.
- Barrs, V.R., Beatty, J.A. (2010). Canine parvovirus infection. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 40(6), 1041-1053. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2010.07.007
- Cavalli, A., Martella, V., Desario, C., Camero, M., Bellacicco, A.L., De Palo, P., et al. (2008). Evaluation of the antigenic relationships among canine parvovirus type 2 variants. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, 15(2), 534-539. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00371-07
- Decaro, N., Elia, G., Martella, V., Campolo, M., Desario, C., Camero, M., et al. (2005). Characterization of the canine parvovirus type 2 variants using minor groove binder probe technology. Journal of Virological Methods, 126(1-2), 109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2005.01.012
- Greene, C. E. (Ed.). (2019). Canine parvovirus. In Blackwell's Five-Minute Veterinary Consult: Canine and Feline (7th ed., pp. 215-216). Wiley-Blackwell.
- Marschner, C. B., & Roach, W. E. (2019). Canine parvovirus. In Cote's Clinical Veterinary Advisor: Dogs and Cats (4th ed., pp. 220-221). Elsevier.
- Greene, C. E. (2012). Canine parvovirus. In Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat (4th ed., pp. 67-81). Elsevier.
Case Reports
- Sep 17, 2023
- Sep 17, 2023
- Sep 17, 2023
- Sep 17, 2023
- Sep 17, 2023
Learning Content
- Published on : Sep 17, 2023
- Published on : Sep 17, 2023
- Published on : Sep 17, 2023
- Published on : Sep 17, 2023
- Published on : Sep 17, 2023